News

How a former socialite scammed her way up by tricking the NYC elite

Anna Sorokin sits at the defense table as the jury deliberates during her trial at New York State Supreme Court, in New York, April 24, 2019. Sorokin, who claimed to be a German heiress, is on trial on grand larceny and theft of services charges.

NEW YORK, N.Y. — The story of Anna "Delvey" Sorokin is so absurd it sounds made up.

While the former New York socialite lied her way through an extravagant and luxurious lifestyle, the story of how she made her way up NYC's highest social ranks by lying and faking her fortune is very much true.

View this post on Instagram

fly thru twice

A post shared by Anna Delvey (@theannadelvey) on

A New York jury on Thursday convicted Sorokin, who bankrolled an implausibly lavish lifestyle with tens of thousands of dollars she swindled from banks, hotels and friends who believed she was a wealthy German heiress.

The Manhattan jury found Sorokin guilty of four counts of theft of services, three counts of grand larceny and one count of attempted grand larceny following a monthlong trial that attracted international attention. She was acquitted of one count of grand larceny and one count of attempted grand larceny.

Her defense attorney, Todd Spodek, said Sorokin could face between five and 15 years in prison on the most serious charge. She is scheduled to be sentenced May 9.

Sorokin also faces deportation to Germany because authorities say she overstayed her visa.

View this post on Instagram

Happy Birthday Me!

A post shared by Anna Delvey (@theannadelvey) on

Using the name Anna Delvey, Sorokin deceived friends and financial institutions into believing she had a fortune of about $67 million (60 million euros) overseas that would cover her high-end clothing, luxury hotel stays and trans-Atlantic travel.

Sorokin became a prominent figure within the New York social scene, networking with people in the fashion, arts, and business worlds as well as Manhattan's rich trust-fund kids. She lived an impossibly lavish lifestyle, spending money everywhere she went on designer items, personal trainers, vacations and picking up tabs for friends and business acquaintances.

She claimed her father was a diplomat or an oil baron and went to extraordinary lengths to have others pay her way. In reality, her father was a truck driver who later opened his own heating and cooling business, New York Magazine reported.

Born in Russia in 1991, Sorokin eventually moved to Germany in 2007 at the age of 16. After she dropped out of college, she interned at Purple Magazine in Paris before landing in New York.

Her end goal, however, was not to simply live a life of luxury off the expense of others. Sorokin had a dream of opening up her own private club, an idea mirrored on the worldwide Soho House chain.

She was accused of forging financial records in an application for a $22 million loan to fund the private arts club she wanted to build, complete with exhibitions, installations and pop-up shops, prosecutors said. She was denied the loan but persuaded one bank to lend her $100,000 she failed to repay.

Spodek insisted that Sorokin planned to settle her six-figure debts and was merely "buying time." He portrayed her as an ambitious entrepreneur who had merely gotten in over her head but had no criminal intent.

View this post on Instagram

@fendi dinner on 83rd fl at the new #one57 #nyfw

A post shared by Anna Delvey (@theannadelvey) on

Prosecutors alleged that she promised one friend an all-expenses paid trip to Morocco but then stuck her with the $62,000 bill — Sorokin was acquitted of that charge.

Spodek said Sorokin was "upset, as anyone would be," following the verdict. But he said he was pleased Sorokin had been acquitted of one of the most serious charges in the indictment: attempting to steal more than $1 million from City National Bank.

View this post on Instagram

Good night SF

A post shared by Anna Delvey (@theannadelvey) on

The verdict followed two days of often tedious deliberations, in which jurors asked for repeated clarification on the law and, in one note to the judge, indicated they had reached a "stalemate" due to a single uncompromising juror. In another note Thursday, jurors said they were "unable to reach a unanimous verdict because we fundamentally disagree."

They reached their verdict less than two hours later.

>> RELATED: Kraft attorneys set to challenge massage video at Friday hearing

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

0