Could Lindsay Clancy’s own words sway the jury? Legal expert weighs impact of journal entries

This browser does not support the video element.

PLYMOUTH, Mass. — As the Lindsay Clancy murder trial enters its sixth day, jurors are continuing to hear evidence focused on the Duxbury mother’s mental state before and after the deaths of her three children in January 2023.

Clancy is accused of killing her three young children before attempting to take her own life. Her defense team argues she was suffering from severe postpartum mental illness and was overmedicated, while prosecutors contend the killings were deliberate.

One of the most significant developments in testimony this week came when jurors heard passages from Clancy’s personal journals, which detailed struggles with anxiety, depression, insomnia, and a desire to get help.

Boston criminal defense attorney Elyse Hershon, who is not involved in the case, said the journal entries could be important because they provide jurors with a firsthand look at Clancy’s mental state in the months leading up to the killings.

“The thing that everybody’s wondering, and what this trial comes down to, is what was Lindsay Clancy’s state of mind?” Hershon said. “What was she doing in the months and weeks leading up to that night?”

Hershon explained that journal entries can be admitted as evidence because they offer insight into a defendant’s mindset.

“It’s a peek into her state of mind,” she said. “The same facts can spin both ways. She’s suffering, she needed help, there were specific symptoms of being overwhelmed dating back to August 2022.”

According to Hershon, both sides are likely to use the journal entries to support their competing theories of the case.

“The prosecution’s going to make an argument in closing based on that, and the defense is going to make a different argument,” she said. “But remember, this is the prosecutor’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Hershon said that while medical testimony and journal entries are important, she does not believe the prosecution has yet met that high legal standard.

“Beyond a reasonable doubt is the highest degree of certainty that we have,” Hershon said. “Do I think they’re there yet? No. But the trial’s not done.”

Another key piece of testimony involved evidence that Clancy asked for an attorney while recovering in the hospital after the killings. Jurors heard that Clancy, unable to speak because she was intubated, wrote notes including a question asking whether she had a lawyer.

Hershon said she does not believe that evidence necessarily undermines the defense’s claim that Clancy was suffering from psychosis.

“The prosecution is going to argue that she was lucid enough to ask for an attorney, that she was focused on herself and preparing her defense,” Hershon said.

However, she noted that seeking legal counsel is a constitutional right and should not automatically be viewed as evidence of guilt.

“The defense is going to say she was able to communicate and still be suffering from severe mental illness,” Hershon said.

The trial is expected to continue with additional testimony from medical professionals as jurors hear more evidence about Clancy’s mental health and the circumstances surrounding the deaths of her children.

Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.

Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW